Nature Photography: Can a Bridge Camera Get the Job Done?

Consider the Striated Heron. It is a tiny heron (40-48 cm long) closely related to the Green Heron of North America and the Galapagos Heron.  My wife and I were out walking and she saw this bird perched on a liana that swings above a small waterfall and plunge pool. It was misty and the sun was behind the bird, so I was not sure if I could get a decent photo. 

I started taking photos in black and white using my grandmother's old Kodak camera. Fifty years later I am still fighting the urge to conserve film- that is, only to press the shutter if I am reasonably certain the result will be worthwhile. Nevertheless, in this instance I managed to quickly aim and shoot, relying on the camera's autofocus capability.  Fortunately the lens was already in the middle zoom position (178 mm, on a zoom range from 4.3 to 357 mm).  The photo is not cropped.
 

Luckily I did not wait for the perfect moment else I would have missed my opportunity. Just after I took the above photo the heron flew down and took up a stealth hunting posture standing on an old log at the front of the plunge pool. The bird was now closer to me, and I was able to zoom in on the head and upper body.  This is the full zoom (357 mm, equivalent to a 2000 mm  telephoto lens in an ordinary SLR camera). Because the tricky lighting conditions seems to confuse the autofocus I switched to manual focus.  The shutter speed is 1/60 of a second. Amazingly, despite not using a tripod, the photo is reasonably sharp.  



Here is my last photo. Do you see a white line to the right and behind the bird? No, it is not a lens flaw; it is part of a spider web.




Can you shoot worthwhile nature photographs using a bridge camera? I hope I have convinced you the answer is "Yes, you can". 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Visit to Sungai Congkak- Part 1

Black Giant Squirrel / Tupai Kerawak Hitam